power laws again (fwd)

From: radev@umich.edu
Date: Wed Apr 04 2007 - 19:10:07 EDT


>From radev Wed Apr 4 19:08:43 2007
Return-Path: <owner-socnet@LISTS.UFL.EDU>
Received: from mail.umich.edu [141.211.14.34]
        by localhost with IMAP (fetchmail-6.2.5)
        for radev@localhost (single-drop); Wed, 04 Apr 2007 19:08:43 -0400 (EDT)
Received: from murder (mail.umich.edu [141.211.14.34])
         by copland.mail.umich.edu (Cyrus v2.3.7) with LMTPA;
         Wed, 04 Apr 2007 19:08:34 -0400
X-Sieve: CMU Sieve 2.3
Received: from murder ([unix socket])
         by mail.umich.edu (Cyrus v2.2.12) with LMTPA;
         Wed, 04 Apr 2007 19:08:34 -0400
Received: from ghostbusters.mr.itd.umich.edu (ghostbusters.mr.itd.umich.edu [141.211.93.144])
        by chaos.mail.umich.edu () with ESMTP id l34N8YsR007456;
        Wed, 4 Apr 2007 19:08:34 -0400
Received: FROM smtp.ufl.edu (smtp01.osg.ufl.edu [128.227.74.149])
        BY ghostbusters.mr.itd.umich.edu ID 46142FE5.23305.11458 ;
         4 Apr 2007 19:08:21 -0400
Received: from listserv.osg.ufl.edu (listserv.osg.ufl.edu [128.227.74.146])
        by smtp.ufl.edu (8.13.7/8.13.7/2.5.9) with ESMTP id l34Muqtb4124866;
        Wed, 4 Apr 2007 19:07:19 -0400
Received: by LISTS.UFL.EDU (LISTSERV-TCP/IP release 14.5) with spool id
          22597878 for SOCNET@LISTS.UFL.EDU; Wed, 4 Apr 2007 19:06:55 -0400
Approved-By: borgatts@BC.EDU
Received: from smtp.ufl.edu (smtp02.osg.ufl.edu [128.227.74.165]) by
          listserv.osg.ufl.edu (8.13.4/8.13.4/2.3.0) with ESMTP id
          l34JsXxL4051142 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA
          bits=256 verify=FAIL) for <socnet@lists.ufl.edu>; Wed, 4 Apr 2007
          15:54:33 -0400
Received: from artemis.chass.utoronto.ca (artemis.chass.utoronto.ca
          [128.100.160.6]) by smtp.ufl.edu (8.13.7/8.13.7/2.5.9) with ESMTP id
          l34JsVYY1925276 for <socnet@lists.ufl.edu>; Wed, 4 Apr 2007 15:54:32
          -0400
Received: from mx1.chass.utoronto.ca (mx1.chass.utoronto.ca [128.100.160.10])
          by artemis.chass.utoronto.ca (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9F1765CBD5 for
          <socnet@lists.ufl.edu>; Wed, 4 Apr 2007 15:35:19 -0400 (EDT)
Received: by mx1.chass.utoronto.ca (Postfix,
          from userid 1000) id C1BF21755D6; Wed, 4 Apr 2007 16:34:16 -0400
          (EDT)
Received: from origin.chass.utoronto.ca (origin.chass.utoronto.ca
          [128.100.160.1]) by mx1.chass.utoronto.ca (Postfix) with ESMTP id
          3161D1755D7 for <socnet@lists.ufl.edu>; Wed, 4 Apr 2007 16:34:16
          -0400 (EDT)
Received: from localhost (wellman@localhost) by origin.chass.utoronto.ca
          (980427.SGI.8.8.8/980728.SGI.AUTOCF) via ESMTP id PAA85488 for
          <socnet@lists.ufl.edu>; Wed, 4 Apr 2007 15:35:18 -0400 (EDT)
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII
X-Bogosity: No, tests=bogofilter, spamicity=0.490234, version=0.92.8
X-Greylist: Sender IP whitelisted, not delayed by milter-greylist-3.0rc3 (smtp.ufl.edu [128.227.74.56]); Wed, 04 Apr 2007 19:07:27 -0400 (EDT)
X-Greylist: Delayed for 00:19:12 by milter-greylist-3.0rc3 (smtp.ufl.edu
            [128.227.74.56]); Wed, 04 Apr 2007 15:54:32 -0400 (EDT)
X-Spam-Status: hits=0, required=5, tests=
X-UFL-Spam-Status: hits=0, required=5, tests=
X-Scanned-By: CNS Open Systems Group (http://open-systems.ufl.edu/services/smtp-relay/)
X-UFL-Scanned-By: CNS Open Systems Group (http://open-systems.ufl.edu/services/smtp-relay/)
Message-ID: <Pine.SGI.4.40.0704041534450.589427-100000@origin.chass.utoronto.ca>
Date: Wed, 4 Apr 2007 15:35:18 -0400
Reply-To: Barry Wellman <wellman@CHASS.UTORONTO.CA>
Sender: Social Networks Discussion Forum <SOCNET@LISTS.UFL.EDU>
From: Barry Wellman <wellman@CHASS.UTORONTO.CA>
Subject: power laws again
To: SOCNET@LISTS.UFL.EDU
Precedence: list
List-Help: <http://lists.ufl.edu/cgi-bin/wa?LIST=SOCNET>,
           <mailto:LISTSERV@LISTS.UFL.EDU?body=INFO SOCNET>
List-Unsubscribe: <mailto:SOCNET-unsubscribe-request@LISTS.UFL.EDU>
List-Subscribe: <mailto:SOCNET-subscribe-request@LISTS.UFL.EDU>
List-Owner: <mailto:SOCNET-request@LISTS.UFL.EDU>
List-Archive: <http://lists.ufl.edu/cgi-bin/wa?LIST=SOCNET>

***** To join INSNA, visit http://www.insna.org *****

UC Davis News & Info
Why the Rich Get Richer

April 2, 2007
        graphic: concentric circles with colored bars
        Networks like this show how some points can get many more
connections. (Raissa D'Souza/UC Davis graphic)

A new theory shows how wealth, in different forms, can stick to some but
not to others. The findings have implications ranging from the design of
the Internet to economics.

Real-world data -- whether distributions of wealth, size of earthquakes or
number of connections on a computer network -- often follow power-law
distributions rather than the familiar bell-shaped curve. In a power-law
distribution, large events are reasonably common compared to smaller
events.

Networks often show power laws. They can be caused by the "rich get
richer" effect, also known as "preferential attachment," where nodes gain
new connections in proportion to how many they already have. That means
some nodes end up with many more connections than others. The phenomenon
is well known, but had been assumed to be just a fundamental property of
networks.

Raissa D'Souza, an assistant professor at the Department of Mechanical and
Aeronautical Engineering and the Center for Computational Science and
Engineering at UC Davis, together with colleagues at Microsoft Research in
Redmond, Wash., UCLA and Cornell University, looked at how "preferential
attachment" can arise in networks.

"'The rich get richer' makes sense for wealth, but why would it happen for
Internet routers?" she said.

D'Souza and colleagues found that they could make tradeoffs between the
network distance between nodes and the number of connections between them.
By tweaking the conditions, they could make preferential attachment -- a
power-law distribution of the number of connections -- stronger or weaker.

These tradeoffs in networks are an underlying principle behind
preferential attachment, D'Souza said. The general framework could be
extended to all kinds of different networks, in biology, engineering,
computer science or social sciences.

"It's exciting because it shows the origins of something that we had
assumed as axiomatic," D'Souza said.

The other authors on the study, which is published online in the journal
Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, are Christian Borgs and
Jennifer T. Chayes at Microsoft Research, Noam Berger at UCLA and Robert
D. Keinberg at Cornell University. A figure from the study will also be
used for the cover art of the April 10 print issue of the journal.

 Barry Wellman
 _____________________________________________________________________

  Barry Wellman S.D. Clark Professor of Sociology NetLab Director
  Centre for Urban & Community Studies University of Toronto
  455 Spadina Avenue Toronto Canada M5S 2G8 fax:+1-416-978-7162
  wellman at chass.utoronto.ca http://www.chass.utoronto.ca/~wellman
        for fun: http://chass.utoronto.ca/oldnew/cybertimes.php
 _____________________________________________________________________

_____________________________________________________________________
SOCNET is a service of INSNA, the professional association for social
network researchers (http://www.insna.org). To unsubscribe, send
an email message to listserv@lists.ufl.edu containing the line
UNSUBSCRIBE SOCNET in the body of the message.

-- 
Dragomir R. Radev                    Associate Professor
SI, CSE, Ling                     U. Michigan, Ann Arbor 
http://www.eecs.umich.edu/~radev         radev@umich.edu              



This archive was generated by hypermail 2b30 : Tue Jun 09 2009 - 05:00:14 EDT